On 09/08/2011 05:18 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Sep 8, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Chris Behrens wrote: >> >> I say this for future decisions. At the moment, Gerrit is what was >> chosen and I'm just interested in seeing if we can alleviate some >> of the pain my team is having working with it. >> > > I still believe that we can get the best of all worlds by writing a > little connector daemon that will automatically scan pull requests > and submit them to gerrit with a change id, update gerrit if the pull > request changes, even update them with feedback from the review and > close them when they merge. It might take some doing, but I don't > think it is impossible.
We actually have this as a todo list item, and I believe it's on someone's plate. Currently, we have a little daemon that watches pull requests and closes them with a message telling people how to submit to gerrit - just so that we don't cause confusion with no feedback. The next step of having that create the gerrit review instead is certainly doable (although I think there are a few semantic questions to be answered about username mapping and so on) All of that to say - yup. Monty _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
