On 08/20/2011 01:26 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Ok but I am going through libvirt instead of xenapi since I am just > using a debian + xen-hypervisor package. > > Also going through libvirt seems to be better, since it doesn’t make > your setup as “strongly” connected to xen. > > For those using the following in debian/ubunbu would the usage of the > xenapi still work? > > ii libxenstore3.0 4.0.1-2 > Xenstore communications library for Xen > ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-35 > Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support > ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-2 > The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 > ii xen-qemu-dm-4.0 4.0.1-2 > Xen Qemu Device Model virtual machine hardware > emulator > ii xen-utils-4.0 4.0.1-2 > XEN administrative tools > ii xen-utils-common 4.0.0-1 > XEN administrative tools - common files > ii xenstore-utils 4.0.1-2 > Xenstore utilities for Xen > > Since I thought xenserver was a separate product?
The support of sdX vs xvdX doesn't depend on your hypervisor, but on the Linux kernel that you run. Please see the Squeeze release notes about it (which I cared to write ...). Thomas _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
