On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Dan Prince <dan.pri...@rackspace.com> wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > Appoligies for the late blueprint submission. I guess I like using Blueprints > for missing features so that I can setup the dependencies in launchpad. On > this specific issue I just wanted some community comments and communication > on the notes I had in etherpad. Although my initial email was poorly worded I > did get a couple useful comments.
No worries, Dan. > Bugs vs. Blueprints is sort of a gray area. When a larger blue print is > accepted (like the Openstack 1.1 API) should we file component features as > bugs or blueprints? > > In my case I could have easily considered this a bug as well since we should > already support the v1.0 API right? Ya, probably should have been a bug, but it's OK. I agree there is some confusion over bugs vs. blueprints... -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
