Tankekontrol On 2/11/11 12:51 PM, "Chris Behrens" <chris.behr...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Paul Voccio wrote: > >> On one hand, I agree it could be separate. This is one of the reasons >>why >> we've waited to push it. Unfortunately, they are so tightly coupled >> because it is going to be directly tied to bugfixes in the compute node >> that the project leads for each are going to have to keep up with revs >>of >> each agent against a rev of nova. It would seem like the issues between >> them would be easier to track if they were all contained in the same >> project. > > >Yeah, I'm mixed. I tend to agree with the arguments for keeping it a >separate project. It makes sense. At the same time, some sort of agent >will be a requirement for configuring a guest in a non-DHCP based >environment. And as you mention, we'll need to keep everything in sync, >so it feels like it should be a part of nova. :-/ > >Anyway, since there seems to be a number of opinions that it should be >separate, I can do so. We'll just need good documentation on what revs >of nova work with what revs of agents. > >So, that said, any opinions on project names? The current unix agent is >'agent-smith' on LP, but I don't completely like that name and the work >I'm doing is significantly modifying the source tree enough that it feels >like it's a new project. > >- Chris > > > >_______________________________________________ >Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net >Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
