On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Brian Schott wrote: > Right now, we're switching on the label, which is I think is a bad idea. I > need to capture this in a blueprint for Diablo, but what we're proposing is > to expand the instance_types dictionary to include additional fields and > possibly turn it into a full editable table so that openstack deployments can > advertise additional capabilities as new instance_types beyond the Amazon > defaults.
Some of this is already in flight (http://wiki.openstack.org/ConfigureInstanceTypesDynamically) … can you take a look at this and see if this could be extended to what you want ? /k _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
