Hi Jason, I think you might wanna check this: http://www.mail-archive.com/nova@lists.launchpad.net/msg00321.html
Worth mentioning that the "release" PPA is actually called "release" not "stable" as mentioned in the above mail. I hope this helps. On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Jason Cannavale <ja...@cannavale.com>wrote: > All, > > > I'm not sure if this has been discussed before at any length, but I would > like to discuss if it makes sense to have source code in the stable trunk > and installable packages built and provided from the rapidly changing > development trunk. > > > For some background we've been working through some proof of concept > deployments. Because the packages are coming from the development trunk we > have been bitten repeatedly by having packages updated following code merges > throughout the day. This has resulted in services such as networking no > longer functioning. It seems to me, at least, that it would make sense to > have a set of known working packages, packaged at each release point, in the > stable trunk and having the source to build from in the development trunk. > > > Thoughts? > > > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
