Rick Clark wrote: > I wrote a simple process for adding core developers and would like > feedback from the community before I take it to the board for approval. > Basically an applicant would send an email to this list asking to be a > core dev for a certain sub-project, i.e., Nova. They would then need > approval responses from 5 current core developers or a majority of > current core developers, whichever is smaller, from that sub-project. > > The proposal is here: > http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/CoreDevProcess > > Please comment. :)
Sounds good to me. I also agree that we need a process for removing core developers. The idea being that core developers that do not have time to actually review the proposed branches should just be simple "developers". Being a core dev is more duties than rights, so people should step down considerately by themselves. But if they don't, it is tricky to define a process that fixes it... -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
