On Aug 3, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Eric Day wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Jorge Williams wrote: >> I'm not that familiar with WSGI but it looks like you're proposing >> something similar to what I have above. >> >> WSGI may indeed be the solution, but I would say, what should be split >> into a separate app should be determined by a specific deployment. We >> should have the capability to split things as needed as an inherit >> feature of the architecture. > > The diagram you had is exactly what WSGI provides. It's a way to > layer differnet steps in the request chain, and we can easily process > them from method to method, or push out across a HTTP transport as > needed. Up until this point, whenever you mentioned a 'proxy' I was > assuming you meant a full HTTP proxy and not just a method call. So > I think we're all on the same page now. :)
Awesome! Can you configure WSGI to split things up as needed for a particular deployment(?) -jOrGe W. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
