+1 On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:28:04PM -0700, Joshua McKenty wrote: > +1 > > Joshua McKenty > Piston Cloud Computing, Inc. > (650) 283-6846 > jos...@piston.cc > > > > On 2011-05-31, at 10:15 AM, John Purrier wrote: > > > +1. > > > > This will not slow the development of the projects and allows logical > > management of the projects to be promoted to "core". In order to make this > > happen we will need to lead the DS timelines, as ttx points out, to allow > > PTL elections and to involve the new project PTL's in the upcoming DS > > planning. > > > > This timeline should be published as part of the overall project lifecycle > > we are developing (inception/affiliated -> incubation -> core project). > > Always recognizing that some projects will stop/hold at specific steps in > > the process (not all project should/can progress to incubated or core). > > > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack....@lists.launchpad.net > > [mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack....@lists.launchpad.net] On > > Behalf Of Thierry Carrez > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:35 AM > > To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net > > Subject: [Openstack-poc] PPB Meeting on June 2nd > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > I won't be able to make the PPB meeting this Thursday. This is a bank > > holiday over here and we are having people for dinner. If you have the > > meeting without me, just a few remarks about Core projects promotion vs. > > release management. > > > > I think projects shouldn't be promoted to "Core projects" status in the > > middle of a development cycle. The reason is that I need to follow Core > > projects from a release management perspective (plans, milestone > > contents, etc.) and you can't just start doing it in the middle of a > > cycle and pray for a successful coordinated release at the end. They > > need to be Core projects for the whole cycle, so decided before the > > design summit time. > > > > So we can definitely promote projects to Incubation status, at which > > point I'd start educating them on release management requirements to > > make sure they can move to Core status for the next release. And we > > should decide, at least one month before the design summit, that a given > > Incubating project will be a Core project for the E development cycle. > > The corresponding PTLs can then join in time the design summit > > organization committee and the PPB. > > > > But IMHO we shouldn't promote Dashboard, or Burrow, or ScalR to Core > > status for Diablo, since Diablo is already well started. > > > > At that point I'd concentrate our efforts in defining "Incubation" and > > making sure the right projects enter that state ASAP. > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > Release Manager, OpenStack > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > > Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > > Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
