On 12/10/2018 14:21, Sean McGinnis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Martin Magr wrote:
Greetings guys,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
majop...@redhat.com> wrote:
Adding the mailing lists back to your reply, thank you :)
I guess that +melvin.hills...@huawei.com <melvin.hills...@huawei.com> can
help us a little bit organizing the SIG,
but I guess the first thing would be collecting a list of tools which
could be published
under the umbrella of the SIG, starting by the ones already in Osops.
Publishing documentation for those tools, and the catalog under
docs.openstack.org
is possibly the next step (or a parallel step).
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:43 PM Rob McAllister <lawnbo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Miguel,
I would love to join this. What do I need to do?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 9, 2018, at 03:17, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <majop...@redhat.com>
wrote:
Hello
Yesterday, during the Oslo meeting we discussed [6] the possibility
of creating a new Special Interest Group [1][2] to provide home and release
means for operator related tools [3] [4] [5]
all of those tools have python dependencies related to openstack such as
python-openstackclient or python-pbr. Which is exactly the reason why we
moved osops-tools-monitoring-oschecks packaging away from OpsTools SIG to
Cloud SIG. AFAIR we had some issues of having opstools SIG being dependent
on openstack SIG. I believe that Cloud SIG is proper home for tools like
[3][4][5] as they are related to OpenStack anyway. OpsTools SIG contains
general tools like fluentd, sensu, collectd.
Hope this helps,
Martin
Hey Martin,
I'm not sure I understand the issue with these tools have dependencies on other
packages and the relationship to SIG ownership. Is your concern (or the history
of a concern you are pointing out) that the tools would have a more difficult
time if they required updates to dependencies if they are owned by a different
group?
Thanks!
Sean
Hello,
the mentioned sigs (opstools/cloud) are in CentOS scope and mention
repository dependencies. That shouldn't bother us here now.
There is already a SIG under the CentOS project, providing tools for
operators[7], but also documentation and integrational bits.
Also, there is some overlap with other groups and SIGs, such as
Barometer[8].
Since there is already some duplication, I don't know where it makes
sense to have a single group for this purpose?
If that hasn't been clear yet, I'd be absolutely interested in
joining/helping this effort.
Matthias
[7] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/OpsTools
[8] https://wiki.opnfv.org/collector/pages.action?key=fastpath
--
Matthias Runge <mru...@redhat.com>
Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
