On 9/6/2018 2:56 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2018-09-06 14:31:01 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/29/2018 1:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Jimmy McArthur <ji...@openstack.org
<mailto:ji...@openstack.org>> wrote:
<snip>
Examples of typical sessions that make for a great Forum:
Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big
picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies
e.g. OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal (Strategic
session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how
to make OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal
Just to clarify some speculation going on in IRC: this is an example,
right? Not a new thing being announced?
// jim
FYI for those that didn't see this on the other ML:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-August/002617.html
[...]
While I agree that's a great post to point out to all corners of the
community, I don't see what it has to do with whether "OpenStack One
Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal" was an example forum topic.
Because if I'm not mistaken it was the impetus for the hullabaloo in the
tc channel that was related to the foundation ML post.
--
Thanks,
Matt
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
