On 01/22/2018 11:36 AM, Maciej Kucia wrote:
Hi!
Is there any noticeable performance penalty when using multiple virtual
functions?
For simplicity I am enabling all available virtual functions in my NICs.
I presume by the above you are referring to setting your
pci_passthrough_whitelist on your compute nodes to whitelist all VFs on
a particular PF's PCI address domain/bus?
Sometimes application is using only few of them. I am using Intel and
Mellanox.
I do not see any performance drop but I am getting feedback that this
might not be the best approach.
Who is giving you this feedback?
The only issue with enabling (potentially 254 or more) VFs for each PF
is that each VF will end up as a record in the pci_devices table in the
Nova cell database. Multiply 254 or more times the number of PFs times
the number of compute nodes in your deployment and you can get a large
number of records that need to be stored. That said, the pci_devices
table is well indexed and even if you had 1M or more records in the
table, the access of a few hundred of those records when the resource
tracker does a PciDeviceList.get_by_compute_node() [1] will still be
quite fast.
Best,
-jay
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/pike/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py#L572
and then
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/pike/nova/pci/manager.py#L71
Any recommendations?
Thanks,
Maciej
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
