On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > [...] > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > creating an > > OpenStack quality assurance special interest group (OpenStack QA SIG). > > The proposal was discussed during the QA feedback session [0] and it > > received > > positive feedback there; I would like to bring now the proposal to a > larger > > audience via the SIG, dev and operators mailing lists. > > [...] > > I think this goes with the current trends of re-centering upstream > "project teams" on the production of software, while using SIGs as > communities of practice (beyond the governance boundaries), even if they > happen to produce (some) software as the result of their work. > > One question I have is whether we'd need to keep the "QA" project team > at all. Personally I think it would create confusion to keep it around, > for no gain. SIGs code contributors get voting rights for the TC anyway, > and SIGs are free to ask for space at the PTG... so there is really no > reason (imho) to keep a "QA" project team in parallel to the SIG ? > That is a possibility indeed, but I think co-existance will be the case for a bit at least - we may decide to drop the QA program eventually depending on how the experience with the SIG goes. > > In the same vein we are looking into turning the Security project team > into a SIG, and could consider turning other non-purely-upstream teams > (like I18n) in the future. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > openstack-sigs mailing list > openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
