On 14/11/17 22:33 +1100, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Saverio,This is still under the stable team reviews... NOT LTS. Your contacts for the Nova Stable team is ... https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/540,members Let's please be clear, we need new people to help with LTS plans. Current teams can't scale, they should not have to and it's totally unfair to expect them to do so.
I think you may have misunderstood Saverio's email. IIUC, what he was trying to do was provide an example in favor of the LTS branches as discussed in Sydney, rather than requesting for reviews or suggesting the stable team should do LTS. Flavio
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Saverio Proto <ziopr...@gmail.com> wrote:Hello, here an example of a trivial patch that is important for people that do operations, and they have to troubleshoot stuff. with the old Stable Release thinking this patch would not be accepted on old stable branches. Let's see if this gets accepted back to stable/newton https://review.openstack.org/#/q/If525313c63c4553abe8bea6f2bfaf75431ed18ea Please note that a developers/operators that make the effort of fixing this in master, should do also all the cherry-pickes back. We dont have any automatic procudure for this. thank you Saverio
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
