Jay,
Your request has been indeed a topic that we have discussed in the past. During
the last UC IRC meeting the UC requested to all Working Groups and Teams under
the umbrella of the UC to report their activities via IRC . Please, take a look
to our last Monday meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2017/uc.2017-08-14-18.02.log.html
So, do not worry all WG/Teams will use IRC to report their activities. They
will still use any other communication mechanism or technology to make progress
in their goals if they desire that. Finally, we have also enabled the
#openstack-uc channel to record all conversations.
Thanks,
Edgar
On 8/15/17, 11:03 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Curtis, Andrew U, Jamie M,
May I request that if the telco working group merges with the LCOO, that
we get regular updates to the openstack[-operator|-dev] mailing list
with information about the goings-on of LCOO? Would be good to get a
bi-weekly or even monthly summary.
Other working groups host their meetings on IRC and publish status
reports to the mailing lists fairly regularly. I personally find this
information quite useful and would be great to see a similar effort from
LCOO.
All the best,
-jay
On 08/15/2017 11:49 AM, Curtis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We've been having NFV-Telecom meetings for OpenStack Operators for a
> while now, but never quite reached a tipping point in terms of
> attendance to "get things done" so to speak.
>
> The point of the group had been to find OpenStack Operators who are
> tasked with designing/operating NFV deployments and help them, but
> were never really able to surface enough of us to move forward. I want
> to be super clear that this group was for OpenStack Operators, and
> isn't a comment on any other NFV related groups in and around
> OpenStack...simply just people like me who deploy NFV clouds based on
> OpenStack.
>
> We are currently considering moving to be a subgroup in LCOO, but
> that's just one idea. In the future, if we can surface more OpenStack
> Operators doing NFV work maybe we revisit.
>
> If anyone has strong feelings around this, please do reply and let me
> know of any ideas/comments/criticism, otherwise we'll probably move to
> discussing with LCOO.
>
> Thanks to all those who attended meetings in the past, it's much
appreciated,
> Curtis.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Doperators&d=DwIGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=bZyB7R-t_eqqqR6lPt0-KRSt00wVbo3A7CHy4_oQHEk&s=QtsCWHLqVgD6CN8v7POve3MHv9xGABS08HzbjE_TTWI&e=
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Doperators&d=DwIGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=bZyB7R-t_eqqqR6lPt0-KRSt00wVbo3A7CHy4_oQHEk&s=QtsCWHLqVgD6CN8v7POve3MHv9xGABS08HzbjE_TTWI&e=
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
