Guys,
I created IPv6 BGP speaker, trying to advertize IPv6 self-service
networks, but I think something is wrong with code, I can see what we
call BGP flapping. Here is what I see in the logs
2017-07-27 09:45:58.304 22037 INFO
neutron_dynamic_routing.services.bgp.agent.driver.ryu.driver [-] BGP
Peer fd00:172:16:1::1 for remote_as=10 went DOWN.
2017-07-27 09:45:58.305 22037 INFO bgpspeaker.speaker [-] unpack
requires a string argument of length 16
2017-07-27 09:46:03.800 22037 INFO bgpspeaker.peer [-] Connection to
peer: fd00:172:16:1::1 established
2017-07-27 09:46:03.808 22037 INFO
neutron_dynamic_routing.services.bgp.agent.driver.ryu.driver [-] BGP
Peer 2.2.2.2 for remote_as=10 is UP.
2017-07-27 09:46:29.284 22037 INFO bgpspeaker.peer [-] Connection to
peer fd00:172:16:1::1 lost, reason: unpack requires a string argument of
length 16 Resetting retry connect loop: False
Does anyone have similar experience? I am pretty there is solution for
this problem, but I just don´t know how to go about it. I suspect we
need to change something on this file?
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/speaker.py
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks
On 2017-08-03 08:00, openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
wrote:
> Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openstack-operators-ow...@lists.openstack.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Experience with Cinder volumes as root disks?
> (George Mihaiescu)
> 2. Re: custom build image is slow (Paras pradhan)
> 3. Re: OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4 (Juanjuan Li)
> 4. Re: OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4 (Juanjuan Li)
> 5. usage hours (Juanjuan Li)
> 6. [all] Announcement: Public Cloud WG (Melvin Hillsman)
> 7. One question about enable hyper-v in openstack (Zhao, Xiaonan)
> 8. Re: OSA Newton ssl endpoint issue (Andy McCrae)
> 9. Re: One question about enable hyper-v in openstack (Pouliot.net)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:42:23 -0400
> From: George Mihaiescu <lmihaie...@gmail.com>
> To: Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>
> Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Experience with Cinder volumes as
> root disks?
> Message-ID: <85c85a63-7ef5-4b16-bc51-ae3550b65...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I totally agree with Jay, this is the best, cheapest and most scalable way to
> build a cloud environment with Openstack.
>
> We use local storage as the primary root disk source which lets us make good
> use of the slots available in each compute node (6), and coupled with the
> Raid10 gives good I/O performance.
>
> We also have a multi petabyte Ceph cluster that we use to store large
> genomics files in object format, as well as backend for Cinder volumes, but
> the primary use case for the Ceph cluster is not booting up the instances.
>
> In this way, we have small failure domains, and if a VM does a lot of IO it
> only impacts a few other neighbours. The latency for writes is low, and we
> don't spend money (and drive slots) on SSD journals improving write latency
> only until the Ceph journal needs to flush.
>
> Speed of provisioning is not a concern because anyway with a small image
> library, most of the popular ones are already cached on the compute nodes,
> and the time it takes for the instance to boot is just a small percentage of
> the total instance runtime (days or weeks).
>
> The drawback is that maintenances requiring reboots need to be scheduled in
> advance, but I would argue that booting from a shared storage and having to
> orchestrate the live migration of 1000 instances from 100 compute nodes
> without performance impact for the workloads running there (some migrations
> could fail because intense CPU or memory activity) is not very feasible
> either...
>
> George
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 11:59, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2017 11:14 AM, John Petrini wrote:
> Just my two cents here but we started out using mostly Ephemeral storage in
> our builds and looking back I wish we hadn't. Note we're using Ceph as a
> backend so my response is tailored towards Ceph's behavior.
> The major pain point is snapshots. When you snapshot an nova volume an RBD
> snapshot occurs and is very quick and uses very little additional storage,
> however the snapshot is then copied into the images pool and in the process
> is converted from a snapshot to a full size image. This takes a long time
> because you have to copy a lot of data and it takes up a lot of space. It
> also causes a great deal of IO on the storage and means you end up with a
> bunch of "snapshot images" creating clutter. On the other hand volume
> snapshots are near instantaneous without the other drawbacks I've mentioned.
> On the plus side for ephemeral storage; resizing the root disk of images
> works better. As long as your image is configured properly it's just a matter
> of initiating a resize and letting the instance reboot to grow the root disk.
> When using volumes as your root disk you instead have to shutdown the
> instance, grow the volume and boot.
> I hope this help! If anyone on the list knows something I don't know
> regarding these issues please chime in. I'd love to know if there's a better
> way.
> I'd just like to point out that the above is exactly the right way to think
> about things.
>
> Don't boot from volume (i.e. don't use a volume as your root disk).
>
> Instead, separate the operating system from your application data. Put the
> operating system on a small disk image (small == fast boot times), use a
> config drive for injectable configuration and create Cinder volumes for your
> application data.
>
> Detach and attach the application data Cinder volume as needed to your server
> instance. Make your life easier by not coupling application data and the
> operating system together.
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 09:41:15 -0500
From: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>
To: "Van Leeuwen, Robert" <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] custom build image is slow
Message-ID:
<cadyt5gn-e+rqc8tttgufioyv3dhutsd1xqh-1b_nmi5zjev...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
It does have the virtio drivers and the image file is qcow2 not raw. To
narrow down the issue this is what I have done.
1) Download CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2 from centos.org. Upload
to
glance and while creating a volume in cinder volume.log I see 250MB/sec
download speed. This is normal in our case.
2) Now boot the qcow2 using kvm/virt-manager , add packages, poweroff
and
upload it to glance , I see 75MB/sec download speed while creating a
volume. If I do virt sparsify it then drops to 30MB/sec.
Not sure why I am seeing this behaviour.
Thanks
Paras.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Van Leeuwen, Robert
<rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
wrote:
> how do we install virtio drivers if its missing? How do I verify it on
the centos cloud image if its there?
> Unless it's a very very ancient unsupported version of centos the virt-io
drivers will be in the kernel package.
> Do a lsmod and look for virtio to check if it is loaded.
Forgot to mention: I do not think this will have anything to do with the
upload speed to cinder even if it is not there.
Cheers,
Robert van Leeuwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170802/6b9dad5b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:24:38 -0500
From: Juanjuan Li <jl...@email.uark.edu>
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82,
Issue 4
Message-ID:
<cakffzhaqqnagcixabnax-7gwrfceqlpuhroumzvjdr1joht...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
"how does openstack calculate the vcpu hours and total disk usage
hours?"
I created a cirros vm with flavor of m1.tiny without further operation
on
that vm.I created it around 2 hours ago but on the dashboard"Overview",
it
shows that "This Period's VCPU-Hours: 44.95 This Period's GB-Hours:
44.95
This Period's RAM-Hours: 23014.62"
Does anyone know how openstack come up with these numbers?I mean
VCPU-Hours, GB-Hours and RAM-hours?I just created a very small
cirros vm without any further operations.How can this number look so
big?
Thank you very much.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:00 AM, <
openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org> wrote:
> Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> openstack-operators
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openstack-operators-ow...@lists.openstack.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: custom build image is slow (Van Leeuwen, Robert)
> 2. Re: custom build image is slow (Van Leeuwen, Robert)
> 3. [scientific] Reminder: Scientific WG IRC meeting today 1100
> UTC (Stig Telfer)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:24:08 +0000
> From: "Van Leeuwen, Robert" <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
> To: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] custom build image is slow
> Message-ID: <ecbc7f76-93fe-432f-9648-611b9a139...@ebay.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>> how do we install virtio drivers if its missing? How do I verify it on
> the centos cloud image if its there?
>
> Unless it's a very very ancient unsupported version of centos the virt-io
> drivers will be in the kernel package.
> Do a lsmod and look for virtio to check if it is loaded.
>
> Regarding the slower speed of the custom image:
> First check if they are really the same file format and one is not
> secretly a raw file:
> file centos.qcow2
>
> I would expect the virt-sparsify to be indeed the way to go.
> Although I think that cinder will convert it to raw for you and you
> probably want that for ceph (IIRC it is a setting).
> It might be that the centos downloaded file is actually RAW so it does not
> need to convert that.
>
> You can also check the cinder server debug log / load or ceph load to see
> if something is bottlenecked during the upload to maybe get a hint to what
> the problem is.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert van Leeuwen
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/
> attachments/20170802/95f679f5/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:25:51 +0000
> From: "Van Leeuwen, Robert" <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
> To: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] custom build image is slow
> Message-ID: <2c5f89e3-dfe1-4dfc-a40f-d5c6ba715...@ebay.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> how do we install virtio drivers if its missing? How do I verify it on
the centos cloud image if its there?
> Unless it's a very very ancient unsupported version of centos the virt-io
drivers will be in the kernel package.
> Do a lsmod and look for virtio to check if it is loaded.
Forgot to mention: I do not think this will have anything to do with the
upload speed to cinder even if it is not there.
Cheers,
Robert van Leeuwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/
attachments/20170802/2c425958/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:07:29 +0100
From: Stig Telfer <stig.openst...@telfer.org>
To: openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>,
user-committee <user-commit...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Reminder: Scientific WG
IRC meeting today 1100 UTC
Message-ID: <b783890e-18a6-49e2-82e6-071e6ef50...@telfer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi All -
We have an IRC meeting today at 1100 UTC in #openstack-meeting (about 2
hours time). Everyone is welcome.
This week we have Pierre Riteau from the Chameleon Cloud presenting
their
work on cloud workload tracing. Plus a round-up of WG activities for
Supercomputing 2017 and OpenStack Days London.
This week's agenda in full is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_working_group#
IRC_Meeting_August_2nd_2017 <https://wiki.openstack.org/
wiki/Scientific_working_group#IRC_Meeting_August_2nd_2017>
Details of our meetings is available here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group <
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group>
Cheers,
Stig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/
attachments/20170802/4d8a8adc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
------------------------------
End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4
**************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170802/d2265087/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:54:38 -0500
From: Juanjuan Li <jl...@email.uark.edu>
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82,
Issue 4
Message-ID:
<cakffzhaw_uiqfu8q-jzyrnlcokvign+r6jkrzhmsed3bawr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
sorry for the wrong post. ignore my post.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Juanjuan Li <jl...@email.uark.edu>
wrote:
> "how does openstack calculate the vcpu hours and total disk usage hours?"
> I created a cirros vm with flavor of m1.tiny without further operation on
> that vm.I created it around 2 hours ago but on the dashboard"Overview", it
> shows that "This Period's VCPU-Hours: 44.95 This Period's GB-Hours: 44.95
> This Period's RAM-Hours: 23014.62"
>
> Does anyone know how openstack come up with these numbers?I mean
> VCPU-Hours, GB-Hours and RAM-hours?I just created a very small
> cirros vm without any further operations.How can this number look so big?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:00 AM, <openstack-operators-request@
> lists.openstack.org> wrote:
>
> Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac
> k-operators
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openstack-operators-ow...@lists.openstack.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: custom build image is slow (Van Leeuwen, Robert)
> 2. Re: custom build image is slow (Van Leeuwen, Robert)
> 3. [scientific] Reminder: Scientific WG IRC meeting today 1100
> UTC (Stig Telfer)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:24:08 +0000
> From: "Van Leeuwen, Robert" <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
> To: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] custom build image is slow
> Message-ID: <ecbc7f76-93fe-432f-9648-611b9a139...@ebay.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> how do we install virtio drivers if its missing? How do I verify it on the
> centos cloud image if its there?
>
> Unless it's a very very ancient unsupported version of centos the virt-io
> drivers will be in the kernel package.
> Do a lsmod and look for virtio to check if it is loaded.
>
> Regarding the slower speed of the custom image:
> First check if they are really the same file format and one is not
> secretly a raw file:
> file centos.qcow2
>
> I would expect the virt-sparsify to be indeed the way to go.
> Although I think that cinder will convert it to raw for you and you
> probably want that for ceph (IIRC it is a setting).
> It might be that the centos downloaded file is actually RAW so it does
> not need to convert that.
>
> You can also check the cinder server debug log / load or ceph load to see
> if something is bottlenecked during the upload to maybe get a hint to what
> the problem is.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert van Leeuwen
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/at
> tachments/20170802/95f679f5/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:25:51 +0000
> From: "Van Leeuwen, Robert" <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>
> To: Paras pradhan <pradhanpa...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] custom build image is slow
> Message-ID: <2c5f89e3-dfe1-4dfc-a40f-d5c6ba715...@ebay.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> how do we install virtio drivers if its missing? How do I verify it on
the centos cloud image if its there?
> Unless it's a very very ancient unsupported version of centos the
virt-io drivers will be in the kernel package.
> Do a lsmod and look for virtio to check if it is loaded.
Forgot to mention: I do not think this will have anything to do with the
upload speed to cinder even if it is not there.
Cheers,
Robert van Leeuwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/at
tachments/20170802/2c425958/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:07:29 +0100
From: Stig Telfer <stig.openst...@telfer.org>
To: openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>,
user-committee <user-commit...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Reminder: Scientific WG
IRC meeting today 1100 UTC
Message-ID: <b783890e-18a6-49e2-82e6-071e6ef50...@telfer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi All -
We have an IRC meeting today at 1100 UTC in #openstack-meeting (about 2
hours time). Everyone is welcome.
This week we have Pierre Riteau from the Chameleon Cloud presenting
their
work on cloud workload tracing. Plus a round-up of WG activities for
Supercomputing 2017 and OpenStack Days London.
This week's agenda in full is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_working_group#IRC
_Meeting_August_2nd_2017 <https://wiki.openstack.org/wi
ki/Scientific_working_group#IRC_Meeting_August_2nd_2017>
Details of our meetings is available here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group <
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group>
Cheers,
Stig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/at
tachments/20170802/4d8a8adc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
------------------------------
End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82, Issue 4
**************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170802/3062d566/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:56:13 -0500
From: Juanjuan Li <jl...@email.uark.edu>
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] usage hours
Message-ID:
<cakffzhbjei1vimqqfc5c3pwjzzi7mthdi37kgxiiqhm6jd-...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
how does OpenStack calculate the vcpu hours, total disk usage hours
I created a cirros VM with the flavor of m1.tiny without further
operation
on that VM.I created it around 2 hours ago but on the
dashboard"Overview",
it shows that "This Period's VCPU-Hours: 44.95 This Period's GB-Hours:
44.95 This Period's RAM-Hours: 23014.62"
Does anyone know how OpenStack come up with these numbers?I mean
VCPU-Hours, GB-Hours, and RAM-hours?I just created a very small
cirros VM without any further operations.How can this number look so
big?
Thank you very much.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170802/311e6362/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:11:45 -0500
From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhills...@gmail.com>
To: user-committee <user-commit...@lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack
Operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack
Mailing List <openst...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [all] Announcement: Public Cloud WG
Message-ID:
<CAMVtB2E=CgJicw=vqpcmtut12mtcvnt3cx_b0nmuqafj3_y...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi everyone,
We would like to announce the Public Cloud WG now being officially under
OpenStack governance! This group has been working very hard for some
time
and have continued to progress through the consistency of its chairs and
members. We are looking forward to hearing great feedback and working
together with the Public Cloud WG to continue the success of OpenStack!
--
Kind regards,
OpenStack User Committee
(Shilla, Shamail, Melvin, Jon, Edgar)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170802/22e427d1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:25:49 +0000
From: "Zhao, Xiaonan" <xiaonan.z...@intel.com>
To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] One question about enable hyper-v in
openstack
Message-ID:
<55d61526adbda640b5204068b050181e50c19...@shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dears:
I am a openstack user, and I want to enable a Windows 2012 server in
openstack, I follow the guides:
https://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/compute/hypervisor-hyper-v.html
https://cloudbase.it/open-vswitch-2-5-hyper-v-part-1/
But it seems that some key points of those guides are not clear enough,
since I had seen hyper-v PC in dashboard, but can't create instance on
hyper-v PC with following error message:
2017-07-30 17:37:44.622 1460 ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance:
1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685] ConnectFailure: Unable to
establish connection to
http://controller_ip:9696/v2.0/ports.json?device_id=1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685:
HTTPConnectionPool(host='controller_ip', port=9696): Max retries
exceeded with url:
/v2.0/ports.json?device_id=1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685 (Caused
by
NewConnectionError('<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection
object at 0x0000000008B97CC0>: Failed to establish a new connection:
[Errno 10061] WSAECONNREFUSED',))
Could you help to check this error? And do openstack hyper-v has an
effective guide? Thank you very much!
Thank you,
Xiaonan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170803/33248b12/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:41:25 +0100
From: Andy McCrae <andy.mcc...@gmail.com>
To: Grant Morley <gr...@absolutedevops.io>
Cc: openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OSA Newton ssl endpoint issue
Message-ID:
<cam2ocdnvcvc+dyjdt-ydp8sjkmdto-asbckhvb0mpsu8jp_...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Grant,,
Somehow missed this email, so sorry for the delay on that one.
Are you setting up the installation with SSL Certs for the public IP
only,
or internal as well?
You should be able to setup the endpoint VIP address instead of an IP -
which would mean the certificate matches the endpoint.
If you're still having trouble drop into the #openstack-ansible IRC
channel
on Freenode, there are usually a few people around,
and we can look into the issues and try help you through it.
Thanks!
Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170803/0c2694ef/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:17:21 -0400
From: "Pouliot.net" <pe...@pouliot.net>
To: "Zhao, Xiaonan" <xiaonan.z...@intel.com>
Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] One question about enable hyper-v
in openstack
Message-ID: <dfa3d296-1e86-4271-a095-a5df1bc04...@pouliot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Looks like you need to change your current setting of 'controller_ip' to
the actual ip or dns resolvable address of a functioning OpenStack
controller.
P
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 AM, Zhao, Xiaonan <xiaonan.z...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Dears:
>
> I am a openstack user, and I want to enable a Windows 2012 server in
> openstack, I follow the guides:
> https://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/compute/hypervisor-hyper-v.html
> https://cloudbase.it/open-vswitch-2-5-hyper-v-part-1/
> But it seems that some key points of those guides are not clear enough, since
> I had seen hyper-v PC in dashboard, but can't create instance on hyper-v PC
> with following error message:
> 2017-07-30 17:37:44.622 1460 ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance:
> 1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685] ConnectFailure: Unable to establish
> connection to
> http://controller_ip:9696/v2.0/ports.json?device_id=1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685:
> HTTPConnectionPool(host='controller_ip', port=9696): Max retries exceeded
> with url: /v2.0/ports.json?device_id=1036dbc7-3d08-4788-92d9-f2491589e685
> (Caused by
> NewConnectionError('<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection
> object at 0x0000000008B97CC0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno
> 10061] WSAECONNREFUSED',))
>
> Could you help to check this error? And do openstack hyper-v has an effective
> guide? Thank you very much!
>
> Thank you,
> Xiaonan
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170803/ef796be1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
------------------------------
End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 82, Issue 5
**************************************************_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
