On 4/27/2017 4:52 PM, Eric Fried wrote:
Y'all-TL;DR: Does glance ever really need/use multiple endpoint URLs? I'm working on bp use-service-catalog-for-endpoints[1], which intends to deprecate disparate conf options in various groups, and centralize acquisition of service endpoint URLs. The idea is to introduce nova.utils.get_service_url(group) -- note singular 'url'. One affected conf option is [glance]api_servers[2], which currently accepts a *list* of endpoint URLs. The new API will only ever return *one*. Thus, as planned, this blueprint will have the side effect of deprecating support for multiple glance endpoint URLs in Pike, and removing said support in Queens. Some have asserted that there should only ever be one endpoint URL for a given service_type/interface combo[3]. I'm fine with that - it simplifies things quite a bit for the bp impl - but wanted to make sure there were no loudly-dissenting opinions before we get too far down this path. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-service-catalog-for-endpoints [2] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/7e7bdb198ed6412273e22dea72e37a6371fce8bd/nova/conf/glance.py#L27-L37 [3] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/%23openstack-keystone.2017-04-27.log.html#t2017-04-27T20:38:29 Thanks, Eric Fried (efried) . __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+openstack-operators -- Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
