Thanks Shamail - We’ve just completed a first pass on our brainstorming in the Scientific WG. Some ideas from a research computing perspective are here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming-scientific-wg More input from WG members (and anyone else) is of course welcome and appreciated. Best wishes, Stig > On 27 Feb 2017, at 20:38, Shamail Tahir <itzsham...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If > you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty > comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track with > speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants in > development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals) discuss > the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome your > participation. > > The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral > space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the > start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be > gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's Ocata > release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of topics > that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together to > discuss key areas within our community/projects. > > Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit within > each one: > • Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big > picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies > • eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal > (Strategic session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how > to make OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal > • Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened at > past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are relevant > to all areas of the community > • eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) – the Large > Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle issues > that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of machines. > • Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users specific > questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last > release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ‘blue sky’ > ideas for the next release. > • eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized by > neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific > questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest > release and ideas about the future. > > There are two stages to the brainstorming: > 1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one on > the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the Forum. > Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out which > ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops events. > 2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based > tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top. > > We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User > Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming > > Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list at: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017 > > Thanks, > User Committee > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
