> On 16 Jan 2017, at 18:00, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On 1/14/2017 4:10 AM, Tim Bell wrote: >> >> o Manual interventions are often required to sync the current usage >> with the OpenStack view > > See this spec in nova in ocata: > > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/ocata/approved/cells-count-resources-to-check-quota-in-api.html > > That is meant to redesign how nova handles quotas so we don't have the sync > issues anymore.
Looks good to me. Pleased to see this is being spec’d out. Do you think it would make it into Pike? > >> >> o Nested projects are now in Keystone but is limited support in other >> projects for the end user benefit, such as delegation of quota for >> sub-projects >> > > We've heard that hierarchical quotas in cinder has some issues so the nova > side has been hesitant to make that a priority until the cinder issues are > fixed. This is going to be an item at the upcoming PTG since it seems like > something that's bigger than nova or cinder and will need to be dealt with by > the broader community to get it right, i.e. maybe the Arch WG needs to help > out here? > Completely agreed. The problem of both the delegated permissions and quota needs a consistent implementation semantics across projects. Since this functionality will be delegated to a resource co-ordinator who may not have the same level of OpenStack knowledge as an admin, keeping the learning curve for this role as low as possible would be a worthwhile goal. Tim > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
