So judging from the Doodle poll results, 1400 UTC bi-weekly on a Wednesday is the favourite choice. I will go ahead and book one of the IRC meeting rooms. Once that's done, I'll put together a draft agenda for a first meeting, and publicise to the lists again. Thanks for all your input so far !
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:55 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> wrote: > Whoops, just realised I can't send to these lists with multiple additional > recipients, so sending again separately .. > > Thank you for all of your interest in this proposal. In order to move > things to the next stage I need to organise a first IRC meeting, and I > think it's probably most appropriate to book one of the openstack-meeting > channels rather than use openstack-operators. Having looked at the current > usage, it looks like every 2 weeks on a Wednesday would work initially, and > there are two times which look possible, 14:00 and 19:00 UTC. The meeting > schedule is fairly complicated, so there may be other options if neither of > these works for a quorum, but can I suggest we start with these options and > work from there ? I've put together a Doodle poll with the two options, and > I'd appreciate your participation in the poll before I go ahead and try to > book a slot. > > http://doodle.com/poll/be43ysxhg5iq3uha > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:43 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> > wrote: > >> So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd >> very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with >> the very high level goal of representing the interests of the public cloud >> provider community around the globe. >> >> I'd like to propose that, in line with the new process for creation of >> working groups, we set up some initial IRC meetings for all interested >> parties. The goals for these initial meetings would be : >> >> 1. Define the overall scope and mission statement for the working group >> 2. Set out the constituency for the group - communication methods, >> definitions of public clouds, meeting schedules, chairs etc. >> 3. Identify areas of interest - eg. technical issues, collaboration >> opportunities >> >> Before I go ahead and schedule first meetings, I'd very much like to >> gather input from the community on interested parties, and if this seems >> like a reasonable first step forward. My thought initially was to schedule >> a first meeting on #openstack-operators and then decide on best timings, >> locations and communication methods from there, but again I'd welcome >> input. >> >> At this point it would seem to me that one of the key metrics for this >> working group to be successful is participation as widely as possible >> within the public cloud provider community, currently approximately 21 >> companies globally according to https://www.openstack.org/m >> arketplace/public-clouds/. If we could get representation from all of >> those companies in any potential working group, then that would clearly be >> the best outcome, although that may be optimistic ! As has become clear at >> recent Ops events, it may be that not all of those companies are >> represented on these lists, so I'd welcome any input on the best way to >> reach out to those folks. >> >> Matt >> > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
