Complete priority list is available on OSIC.org<http://osic.org> website and 
currently there is no info about VPNaaS or FWaaS. There are mails added to 
people responsible for roadmap and when you will have a complete list of people 
which need this feature you can contact them and discuss about this.

Regards,
Lubosz "diltram" Kosnik
OSIC team member

Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2016, at 9:27 AM, Melvin Hillsman 
<mrhills...@gmail.com<mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Thank you Matt for the update and call to action.

On Apr 29, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Matt Jarvis 
<matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk<mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk>> wrote:

Yes the problem is exactly that there is a lack of developer resource on VPNaaS 
and FWaaS specifically, and probably because these aren't functions many 
vendors need. We'd like to explore what mechanisms there could be for funding 
resource, but the most important thing right now is for all those operators who 
need these functions to make themselves known so there is a metric.

On 29 April 2016 at 08:43, Kosnik, Lubosz 
<lubosz.kos...@intel.com<mailto:lubosz.kos...@intel.com>> wrote:
The idea of OSIC clusters is to give people access to multi node environments 
to test software in scale. There are a lot of thing which brakes in big scale.
If I'm right the problem is that there is not so many developers which are 
working on this *asS but please tell if I'm wrong.

Lubosz "diltram" Kosnik
OSIC team member

Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2016, at 8:19 AM, Melvin Hillsman 
<mrhills...@gmail.com<mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com><mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com<mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com>>>
 wrote:

Please take a moment to reach out to the Neutron team and visit the following. 
Could this resource be of use to address their concern?
https://osic.org/clusters

On Apr 29, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Matt Jarvis 
<matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk<mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk><mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk<mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk>>>
 wrote:

As some of you on this list may already know, there are issues in the Neutron 
team with development resources on VPNaas and FWaaS, and there have been 
discussions in Austin about deprecating the code from the main Neutron 
codebase. The decision is currently that the code will remain for another 6 
months, after which time if no dev resource has emerged, then they will be 
deprecated.

I know there are operators relying on these functions, particularly in the 
public cloud space in Europe, so this would impact those people. I also know 
this list doesn't necessarily reach all of them either, so I will try and reach 
out by other means as well, but it would be very useful to try and get a 
clearer picture of how many people are using VPNaaS and FWaaS. If you are, 
could you please respond to this thread ?

If we have metrics that a constituent part of the user community need these 
functions, then we can try and find a way to help the Neutron team to cover the 
resourcing gaps.

Matt

DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org><mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org><mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to