We've done the opposite, newer Keystone with older code. No issues that we've seen.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) < kevin...@cisco.com> wrote: > We've even done later versions of keystone with older versions of other > stuff (Specifically Kilo Keystone with Juno Glance/Heat and Icehouse > everything else)... > > The thing I'd watch out for going the other direction is if the newer > version of, let's say, nova, requires API calls which aren't present in > your older version of Keystone. I can't think of any specific calls off the > top of my head, but that'd be the only major read flag which comes to mind. > > > > On 1/5/16, 10:50 PM, "Abel Lopez" <alopg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >We've done things like Icehouse keystone and Juno glance/heat/ceilometer. > > > > > >Seems like having older keystone is somewhat safe. > > > >On Tuesday, January 5, 2016, Marcus Furlong <furlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >Hi, > > > >Just wanted to check if it's possible to have a mixed version > >environment with kilo keystone and e.g. liberty nova. > > > >Has anyone done this? Any gotchas? > > > >Regards, > >Marcus. > >-- > >Marcus Furlong > > > >_______________________________________________ > >OpenStack-operators mailing list > >OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org <javascript:;> > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
