it's a voted position. there just aren't that many operators who vote compared to devs and other contributors. to say nothing of non-contributors who sign up for accounts to vote for their co-workers.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Subbu Allamaraju <su...@subbu.org> wrote: > +1. Operator/user community is large enough for such a representation. > > Can you elaborate on operators lacking the power? > > > On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, matt <m...@nycresistor.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I > don't see that happening. Operators just don't have the voting power the > devs do. Unless someone wants to spam their own corp backers for voting > support ( not really ethical, though obviously being done ). > > -Matt > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:09 PM, David Medberry <openst...@medberry.net> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Isn't it time to get an operational director--or rather >> another/additional operators as directors? I've nominated a few (unnamed >> here) and you may be interested in nominationg others. Look for the email >> with subject line: >> Notice of meeting to elect Individual Directors >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
