Edgar, > I also wanted to bring to your attention that during the summit the > attendance was lower that in the mid-cycle one (Philadelphia). Probably > because there are so many things running in parallel that people just need to > decide between very important sessions. So, does it make sense to have four > Operators meetups along the year? Maybe not! > What about just having the mid-cycle ones?
Having built and invested several operational products/glue to run OpenStack at scale, my ideal scenario is that operational features become part of OpenStack projects, discussed along side regular non-operational features at the summit. Unfortunately, this style of convergence is not happening yet due to the lag between what dev-side is building and what operators are running (55% operators running >12 months old code). Nonetheless I think such a convergence is extremely important for long-term viability of OpenStack and the operator community. Though not related to the subject of this thread, I just want to leave this thought on how the operators’ activities in the community should evolve. Thanks Subbu _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
