Hello.
If we have two computes, and each is network node, that means both hosts
a router.
Let say we have two tenants with two instance and two compute hosts.
Compute1-tenant1-instance1
compute2-tenant2-instance2
But neutron have no idea about this. Someone asks him 'put router to any
l3-agent'. And it put router1 on compute2, and router2 on compute1.
It will works. Until not. If compute1 goes down it not only affects
instance1, but also will cause disruption for network services for tenant2.
And there is no way to control l3 agent placement, no respect to
availability zones, instance placement, aggregates, etc.
On 01/29/2015 01:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/20/2014 11:16 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
do 'network node on compute' is kinda sad
Why?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
