Excerpts from Sławek Kapłoński's message of 2014-09-18 09:29:27 -0700: > Hello, > > Is anyone here using openstack with mysql galera and haproxy? Have You got > any > problems with that? > I was today installed such ha infra for database (two mysql servers in galera > cluster and haproxy on controller and neutron node, this haproxy is > connecting > to one of galera servers with round robin algorithm). Generally all is > working > fine but I have few problems: > 1. I have a lot of messages like: > WARNING neutron.openstack.common.db.sqlalchemy.session [-] Got mysql server > has gone away: (2006, 'MySQL server has gone away') > 2. I have (most on neutron) many errors like: > OperationalError: (OperationalError) (2013, 'Lost connection to MySQL server > during query') 'UPDATE ml2_port_bindings SET vif_type=%s, driver=%s, > segment=%s WHERE ml2_port_bindings.port_id =
1 and 2 look like timeout issues. Check haproxy's timeouts. They need to be just a little longer than MySQL's connection timeouts. > 3. Also errors: > StaleDataError: UPDATE statement on table 'ports' expected to update 1 > row(s); > 0 were matched. > 4. and errors: > DBDeadlock: (OperationalError) (1213, 'Deadlock found when trying to get > lock; > try restarting transaction') 'UPDATE ipavailabilityranges SET first_ip=%s > WHERE > ipavailabilityranges.allocation_pool_id = 3 and 4 are a known issue. Our code doesn't always retry transactions, which is required to use Galera ACTIVE/ACTIVE. Basically, that doesn't work. You can use ACTIVE/PASSIVE, and even do vertical partitioning where one of the servers is ACTIVE for Nova, but another one is ACTIVE for Neutron. But AFAIK, ACTIVE/ACTIVE isn't being tested and the work hasn't been done to make the concurrent transactions work properly. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators