Ian Wienand <iwien...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 06:35:28AM +0000, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: >> I guess that means that you are not against the idea. > > I know it's probably not what you want to hear, but as it seems > favicons are becoming a component of branding like a logo I think > you'd do well to run your proposed work by someone with the expertise > to evaluate it with-respect-to whatever branding standards we have (I > imagine someone on the TC would have such contacts from the Foundation > or whoever does marketing). > > If you just make something up and send it, you're probably going to > get review questions like "how can we know this meets the branding > standards to be the logo on our most popular website" or "is this the > right size, format etc. for browsers in 2020" which are things > upstream marketing and web people could sign off on. So, personally, > I'd suggest a bit of pre-coordination there would mean any resulting > technical changes would be very non-controversial.
That bridge has been crossed for opendev.org, which has a well-thought-out favicon. I think adding the same one to review.opendev.org is a technical exercise at this point. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
