W dniu 10.01.2018 o 18:28, Jeremy Stanley pisze: > On 2018-01-10 09:06:43 -0800 (-0800), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> So it's my understanding (which is limited at best) that zuul >> currently doesn't support something like "this job has to run on >> nodepool X", which would be necessary. We might need to add some sort >> of metadata for nodepools and be able to specify in zuul job that >> "this job has to land on node with metadata X", like architecture: >> arm64.
> This shouldn't be an issue since our node types are tightly coupled > to the images they boot, and the arm64 architecture images will I'm > sure get distinct names (as an offshoot of this though, we may end > up extending the names of our current amd64 images to embed > processor architecture names for consistency, but this is one of the > many points we'll need to debate). Docker images can be multiarch so same names are used on different architectures. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
