Tristan Cacqueray <tdeca...@redhat.com> writes: >>> I also proposed a 'plugin' interface so that driver are fully contained >>> in their namespace, which seems like another legitimate addition to this >>> feature: >>> https://review.openstack.org/524620 >> >> I think that will be a nice thing to have, but I'd like to delay it (as >> we have for Zuul) much further into the future. I'd like to make a >> couple of releases where we think the internal API is stable before we >> consider making an external API. In the mean time, I'd like to expand >> the set of drivers we support in-tree. >> > Note that this help adding test and it makes rebase easier... How about > we keep it for the internal API without supporting out of tree drivers?
If that's the case, I think it would be fine -- as long as it's not exposed at all (we should remove the config file setting in favor of direct imports, for example). -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
