On 2016-06-21 17:34:07 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-06-21 18:16:49 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > > It hurts a lot when it's down because of so many services being served from > > it. We could also separate the published websites (status.o.o, > > governance.o.o, security.o.o, releases.o.o...) which require limited > > resources and grow slowly, from the more resource-hungry storage sites > > (logs.o.o, tarballs.o.o...). > > Agreed, that's actually a pretty trivial change, comparatively > speaking.
Oh, though it bears mention that the most recent extended outage (and by far longest we've experienced in a while) would have been just as bad either way. It had nothing to do with recovering attached volumes/filesystems, but rather was a host outage at the provider entirely outside our sphere of control. That sort of issue can potentially happen with any of our servers/services no matter how much we split them up. -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
