Zaro <zaro0...@gmail.com> writes: > I forgot to mention that the apps we use (gerrit and cgit) to host our > git repos do read the repos directly from disk therefore I think that > performing a gc on the repos would provide a performance improvement > (CPU and memory utilization) to gerrit and cgit. It might be > difficult to quantify how much of an improvement since both those apps > do some cacheing of the repo data. Anyways I think there would be > other benefits of `git gc` over `gerrit repack -adf` besides just > recovering disk space. -Khai
What was the effect of 'git prune' with 'git gc'? In my original message, I mentioned that the two together had the greatest effect on disk space -- the change in ref structure could have a significant impact to cloning time as well, but also to our ability to issue corrective modifications to the repos. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
