Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
I don't mind that much for stable/liberty, since it predates the
"officialness" of Kolla: I'm fine with any solution there. I'm more
concerned about stable/mitaka and going forward. Stable branches are
supposed to be known quantities, slow moving and safe changes. What
you're proposing wouldn't be an option for stable/mitaka -- so I'd like
to make sure we don't find ourselves in a similar situation in the future.
Going forward this will not happen again. I agree a stable branch should
be a slow rate of change repository but also a safe place to rely on. At
present stable/liberty is completely unsafe, so much so that I personally
wrote a document in our docs.oo pages that says "DON'T UE IT". We are
only backporting high/critical bugs which are legitimate bugs and not
features to our stable branches. Note we will be backporting any gate
changes, (which could be considered "features", but this is to simplify
our lives so we don't have different gates for different versions of
OpenStack.
The main reason this won't happen again is we have decoupled the ansible
1.9 pin on docker 1.8.2. Now we can use any version of Docker we need,
which is 1.10 and greater.
Hope the context is useful.
OK, as I said, liberty is pre-official so I'm fine with any solution
here. We seem to be in agreement that the proposed solution should not
be applied on stable/mitaka and later.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
