Thanks, most awesome. Alas, if this was around three weeks ago, I'd still have a full head of hair. Now all I have is a lifetime of savings on hairdressing.
-amrith | -----Original Message----- | From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com] | Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:33 AM | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) | Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org | Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cross-Repo Dependencies in Zuul | | Amrith Kumar <amr...@tesora.com> writes: | | > This is awesome news! | > | > If I understand correctly, your description of "multiple changes" | > describes cases where a single change depends on multiple changes. My | > question is related to one-to-one dependencies in the form A -> B -> | > C. | > | > I'm assuming that this is supported as well in the case where, for | > example, A and C are in one repository and B is in another repository, | > yes? | | Yes and yes. When writing the "multiple changes" section, I was | describing how you can make A->B and A->C. If you're curious, that gets | serialized as B,C,A. | | A->B->C works as well (and of course is serialized as C,B,A). The | enqueuing function is recursive, so, well, it works up to the Python stack | limit. :) | | -Jim | | __________________________________________________________________________ | OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) | Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe | http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
