You mean, the blog post of jaypipes. I too used these instructions to make my CI. That time its was this version I installed.
I need to check my CI with latest Zuul version and stop gearman server. But There are many jobs in pipeline for testing. Waiting for a good time to stop the CI for this test. Thanks for the help. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 8:28 AM To: Somanchi Trinath-B39208; James E. Blair Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Zuul] Understanding dequeue-on-new-patchset I’m sure someone in infra can give you an exact answer, but I installed in July, and it has it: $ zuul --version Zuul version: 2.0.0.215.gda3a074 … and I was using blog instructions from a year or two prior, which referenced it being in there as well. Doug On 8/22/14, 8:54 PM, "trinath.soman...@freescale.com" <trinath.soman...@freescale.com> wrote: >Which version of Zuul has that, I want to upgrade to the that version >and stop gearman server. > > > >-- >Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] >Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 8:13 AM >To: Somanchi Trinath-B39208; James E. Blair >Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Zuul] Understanding >dequeue-on-new-patchset > >Yes, there’s one built into the zuul process. You don’t have to run a >separate gearman. > >doug > >On 8/22/14, 8:29 PM, "trinath.soman...@freescale.com" ><trinath.soman...@freescale.com> wrote: > >>Hi Jim- >> >>Zuul itself has a gearman server? >> >>" Note that for OpenStack, we use Zuul's internal gearman server." I'm >>confused here. >> >>-- >>Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com] >>Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 11:30 PM >>To: Somanchi Trinath-B39208 >>Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org >>Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Zuul] Understanding >>dequeue-on-new-patchset >> >>"trinath.soman...@freescale.com" <trinath.soman...@freescale.com> writes: >> >>> Hi Jim- >>> >>> As you said, >>> >>> [ Strictly speaking, that will mean that every patchset will go >>>through the merger and Jenkins. >>> But if testing for a patchset is in progress when a new patchset is >>> uploaded, the tests will abort. ] >>> >>> >>> This above is not happening in my case. Though there are latest >>>patchsets in queue, the Build in Jenkins is not aborted. >>> >>> When I check the Zuul debug log, I get this error >>>http://paste.openstack.org/show/98555/ which was reported when Zuul >>>tried to abort a build with Jenkins. >>> >>> My Zuul Layout.yaml is here http://paste.openstack.org/show/98556/. >>> >>> I feel there is something wrong with Gearman and Jenkins linkage for >>>cancelling a job. >>> >>> Kindly guide me resolve the issue. >> >>2014-08-22 06:03:23,716 DEBUG zuul.Gearman: Response to cancel build >><Build 7a405e1de0f140fb8e2b99d7e6887d72 of Freescale-FWaaS-Plugin on >><Worker Unknown>> request: ERR UNKNOWN_COMMAND >>Unknown+server+commandcancel >> >>What gearman server are you running? If you are using the one from >>https://launchpad.net/gearmand I believe you will need a relatively >>recent version that includes the cancel command. >> >>Note that for OpenStack, we use Zuul's internal gearman server. >> >>-Jim >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
