Hey all, I spoke to a few people about this on IRC, and I think it's just barely not crazy enough to commit it to email.
Basically, I've been doing a little bit of hacking on ansible playbooks for some of the little sysadmin tasks we have which aren't really puppet-sensible. As part of that, I wrote this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100066/2/modules/openstack_project/files/ansible/run_mirror.yaml Which looks remarkably like this: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/macros.yaml#n288 It would be even more similar if I redid the body of that playbook as a "role" - which would remove the hosts and give it a name. It got me thinking - as we're starting to think about how jjb and turbo-hipster interact, what if we brainstormed for a bit about whether or not there are ways to either join forces with the ansible folks, or at least to steal from them if they don't like us. At the end of the day, jjb and ansible are both trying to simply describe sequences of tasks to run in places, and separate out the definition of the tasks from the definition of the orchestration of those tasks. So what if it was possible to take the same chunk of yaml, pass it to ansible for one-off direct execution against a host or hosts, or pass it to jjb to get it exploded into jenkins xml? Ansible can also do local exec of rolls/playbooks, which is a thing we want out of turbo-hipster (we don't have to use ansible itself for that - but otoh, if there is already a thing that can read the yaml and execute things locally and that thing is python - then win!) Now - on the other hand, they're close, but they're not perfectly aligned, so we'd have to figure out what we'd want to do about that. Anyway - not urgent - just food for thought. Monty _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
