Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/).
I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think this is probably worthy of a vote (which is the main benefit of ATC status after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer him extra-ATC status in docs because of his work with making sense of the dev list? Interested in your thoughts. (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through Linux Australia) Lana On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi cores, > > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's > email to the dev list: > >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular >> process because they have not submitted a patch. > > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in > docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's shop the idea on > this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 August, so we > don't have much time. > > Thanks, > Lana > > > > -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
