Hello Everyone, > It was recently brought to my attention that the core teams for Training > Guides[1] and Training Labs[2] are out of date. > > > > I'd like to propose that we keep the speciality team leads (Matjaž for > Guides, Pranav and Roger for Labs) listed as cores, but then include the > openstack-doc-core team [3] as well. This will mean the list stays up to > date over time, without a whole lot of manual pruning. > > > > What does everyone think? >
I agree with this. > It would be great to have docs team as fallback but I don't expect me to > review either of these with the exception of infrastructure changes - > and for some of these it would have been helpful in the past ;) > +1 for this change. I would not expect the docs-core-team to review things on a regular basis but step in as fallback/emergancy squad for the same. At the same time (I trust our core team) we need to establish no-workflow/merging agreement unless really necessary. > > 1: > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/uuid-3490bf37012cb344104cb315f3dd5c76dabea62f,members > > 2: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1118,members > > Looking at stackalytics reviews for Mitaka and Newton, I agree to remove > everybody except Matjaz. What about adding Ian Y. Choi? > I would like to be a part of training-guides core till we have more regular core team members. Partially I think having atleast 2x+2's works really well. Partially I would be committing a bit more to training-guides. > > 3: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/30,members Thanks for bringing this up. Happy to see the support from the docs-core-team. Regards, Pranav
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
