Le 01/02/2017 13:58, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > On 02/01/2017 10:54 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Typically we have two keystone service listening on two separate ports >> 35357 and 5000. >> >> Historically one of the port had limited functionality, but today I do >> not see why we want >> to have two separate service/port from the same code base for similar >> purposes. >> >> Effective we use double amount of memory than it is really required, >> because both port is served by completely different worker instances, >> typically from the same physical server. >> >> I wonder, would it be difficult to use only a single port or at least >> the same pool of workers for all keystone(identity, auth..) purposes? >> >> Best Regards, >> Attila > > This has been discussed and agreed a long time ago, but nobody did the > work. Please do get rid of the 2nd port. And when you're at it, also get > rid of the admin and internal endpoint in the service catalog. >
Only 35357 is declared as a regular IANA service port : http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=openstack You can do whatever you want with the other port, that's a configuration option. -Sylvain > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
