On 01/30/2017 11:55 AM, Major Hayden wrote: > Hello there, > > I just submitted a patch[0] to bump Jinja2's upper constraint to 2.9.5. > > We previously set the upper constraint to 2.8.1[1] when a change appeared > that broke Ansible. The bug caused the `groupby` filter to return a > namedtuple and it was fixed later in 2.9.5, which was released[2] two days > ago. Other than that bug, the 2.9.0-2.9.4 releases worked fine. > > Version 2.9.5 also contains two new tests[3] which are very helpful for the > openstack-ansible-security role. > > Would it be possible to get the upper constraint for Jinja2 changed for > Ocata? Thanks! > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426857/ > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418494/ > [2] https://github.com/pallets/jinja/releases/tag/2.9.5 > [3] https://github.com/pallets/jinja/pull/624 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
This'll impact neutron as well and I'd like their ack on this. Though it generally looks fine to me. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
