Hi Renat, For more details, i will go to check on the CBAM machine and hope it is not deleted yet since we have done it for around a week. Another thing is Jinja2 showed us that it run 2-3 times faster with the same test with YAQL. More information i will also provide it later.
Br, Tuan On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tuan, > > I don’t think that Jinja is something that Kirill is responsible for. It’s > just a coincidence that we in Mistral support both YAQL and Jinja. The > latter has been requested by many people so we finally did it. > > As far as performance, could you please provide some numbers? When you say > “takes a lot of time” how much time is it? For what kind of input? Why do > you think it is slow? What are your expectations?Provide as much info as > possible. After that we can ask YAQL authors to comment and help if we > realize that the problem really exists. > > I’m interested in this too since I’m always looking for ways to speed > Mistral up. > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia > > On 18 Jan 2017, at 16:25, lương hữu tuấn <tuantulu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Kirill, > > Do you have any information related to the performance of Jinja and Yaql > validating. With the big size of input, yaql runs quite so slow in our case > therefore we have plan to switch to jinja. > > Br, > > @Nokia/Tuan > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:02 PM, lương hữu tuấn <tuantulu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Kirill, >> >> Thank you for you information. I hope we will have more information about >> it. Just keep in touch when you guys in Mirantis have some performance >> results about Yaql. >> >> Br, >> >> @Nokia/Tuan >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Kirill Zaitsev <kzait...@mirantis.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think fuel team encountered similar problems, I’d advice asking them >>> around. Also Stan (author of yaql) might shed some light on the problem =) >>> >>> -- >>> Kirill Zaitsev >>> Murano Project Tech Lead >>> Software Engineer at >>> Mirantis, Inc >>> >>> On 17 January 2017 at 15:11:52, lương hữu tuấn (tuantulu...@gmail.com) >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We are now using yaql in mistral and what we see that the process of >>> validating yaql expression of input takes a lot of time, especially with >>> the big size input. Do you guys have any information about performance of >>> yaql? >>> >>> Br, >>> >>> @Nokia/Tuan >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op >>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
