Sounds like we must have a memory leak in the Linux bridge agent if that's the only difference between the Linux bridge job and the ovs ones. Is there a bug tracking this?
On Jan 13, 2017 08:58, "Clark Boylan" <cboy...@sapwetik.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, at 07:48 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > > Does anybody know whether we can bump memory on nodes in the gate > > without losing resources for running other jobs? > > Has anybody experience with memory consumption being higher when using > > linux bridge agents? > > > > Any other ideas? > > Ideally I think we would see more work to reduce memory consumption. > Heat has been able to more than halve their memory usage recently [0]. > Perhaps start by identifying the biggest memory hogs and go from there? > > [0] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017- > January/109748.html > > Clark > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
