On 2016-12-21 16:22, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> [...]
> That said, I think there are two better places for this information
> that are already standards in OpenStack:
>
> * README.rst
> * HACKING.rst
>
> Most projects include links to the contributing documentation in at
> least one of these files. I think the effort here is to standardize,
> albeit in a brand new file, and that's admirable.
If that's the goal - to standardize - then I would expect that we move
all the documentation out of those files in one place.
Right now, the changes duplicate information that exists - and the new
information is often wrong. It points to place that do not exist or
where better places exist. ;(
I'm fine with the status quo - of using the two files that you mention.
Having contribution information is important,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
