Hey, There is already an experimental job called "gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-ha-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv" (which was added by [1]).
However, the job is currently a "one dvr_snat nodes, two dvr nodes" deployment (instead of the "two dvr_snat nodes, one dvr node" that it should be in order to make L3HA work there). The patch which makes the final transition is being worked on in [2], and it's ready to be merged afaik. Once it merges, we'll have a DVR+HA gate in the experimental queue. John. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383742/ [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383827/ On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > Infra patch proposed in [1] got me thinking again about what we shall do > when it comes to multinode testing in the gate and how to focus our testing > and CI efforts upstream going forward. My line of thinking has always been > that multinode resources should be devoted to configurations whose coverage > fully benefit from the inherent nature of the distributed deployment, and > that means giving priority to DVR+HA and demote other configurations that > use centralized routing. > > I know that some of you in team have worked on this, but I am a bit behind > on the latest status update. Any good soul willing to bring a strapped (for > time) PTL up to speed? > > Cheers, > Armando > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411263/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- John Schwarz, Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
