> On Dec 13, 2016, at 4:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks!
> 
> Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: 
> we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after 
> introspection. The new credentials are passed back from inspector to the 
> ramdisk, and the ramdisk calls "ipmitool" to set them.
> 
> Now I realize that the feature has quite a few substantial drawbacks:
> 1. It's a special case in ironic-inspector. It's the only thing that runs 
> after introspection, and it requires special state machine states and actions.
> 2. There is no way to signal errors back from the ramdisk. We can only poll 
> the nodes to see if the new credentials match.
> 3. This is the only place where ironic-inspector modifies physical nodes (as 
> opposed to modifying the ironic database). This feels like a violation of our 
> goal.
> 4. It depends on ipmitool actually being able to update credentials from 
> within the node without knowing the current ones. I'm not sure how wildly 
> it's supported. I'm pretty sure some hardware does not support it.
> 5. It's not and never will be tested by any CI. It's not possible to test on 
> VMs at all.
> 6. Due to its dangerous nature, this feature is hidden behind a configuration 
> option, and is disabled by default.
> 
> The upside I see is that it may play nicely with node autodiscovery. I'm not 
> sure they work together today, though. We didn't end up using this feature in 
> our products, and I don't recall being approached by people using it.
> 
> I suggest deprecating this feature and removing it in Pike. The rough plan is 
> as follows:
> 
> I. Ocata:
> * Deprecate the configuration option enabling this feature.
> * Create an API version that returns HTTP 400 when this feature is requested.
> * Deprecate the associated arguments in CLI.
> * Issue a deprecating warning in IPA when this feature is used.
> 
> II. Pike:
> * Remove the feature from IPA and ironic-inspector.
> * Remove the feature from CLI.
> 
> Please respond with your comments and/or objects to this thread. I'll soon 
> prepare a patch on which you'll also be able to comment.
> 

I agree with deprecating this version of this feature. I do see the potential 
for credential rotation as a thing Ironic could handle in the future, but it 
would need to be handled in a periodic fashion vs being done once at startup.

I’m +2 to what’s proposed.

-Jay

> Dmitry.
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to