Hi Matt, Out of the box Shaker doesn't support such topology. It shouldn't be hard to implement though. Let me check what needs to be done.
Thanks, Ilya 2016-11-24 13:49 GMT+03:00 Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr>: > Hello, > > I'm looking to shaker capabilities and I'm wondering if this kind > of accomodation (see attachment also) can be achieved > > Ascii (flat) version : > > CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN2 (2n VMs) > CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs) > CN2 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs) > > In this situation concurrency could be mapped to the number of > simultaneous flows in use per link. > > Best, > > Matt > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
