On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> not_in is nice and explicit while nin and out are a bit, more clever. I think > we should avoid trying to be clever. Since we already had ‘new’, I thought that ‘nin’ would be consistent. No other reason to prefer it, though. > That said, what about something like > > state=!in:x,y,z > > This just makes me nervous that we're beginning to define our own query > language. Ugh - let’s not do that! -- Ed Leafe __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
