On 11/12/2016 11:15 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
The proposal I think you made is what I was thinking we would do, so just to 
clarify:
 Kolla keeps all branches/tags
 When kolla-ansible is created with an upstream tag in PC, the project-config 
will include no post jobs so no artifacts will be created

we import the complete repo - so create a copy of the repo for import, delete the branches and tags on that copy - and then it gets imported as is. Then you don't need post jobs removal.

Kolla-ansible will have all branches deleted from it (so we maintain the back 
ports in the kolla repo where the code originated

Do this as before.

New (ocata) versions of kolla-ansible will have a 4.0.0 tag but no branches, 
and possibly no tags.

The delta between kolla and kolla-ansible is in the diagram in this thread, but 
in a nutshell:

Today Kolla contains build.py docker dir, sensible dir, and kolla-ansible.py

In the future:
Kolla - contains build.py, docker dir
Kolla-ansible contains sensible dir, kolla-ansible.py

Both repos contain whatever is needed to make those repos work with the various 
OpenStack processes.

I agree back ports will be more challenging in general with a repo split.  The 
core reviewers committed to maintaining back ports properly when they voted on 
the repo split.

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to