On 11/11/2016 03:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 11/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Matt, thanks much for your excellent summary of the resource provider
sessions in Barcelona. A couple minor corrections noted below.
On 11/02/2016 01:54 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
- Custom resource classes
The code for this is moving along and being reviewed. There will be
namespaces on the standard resource classes that nova provides.
Note that the opposite is what was decided: there will be no namespace
on standard resource classes, but we will be using a CUSTOM_ string
prefix for any resource classes that are added via the REST API (i.e.
they are user-created "custom resource classes").
All other resource classes that exist now (or in the future) in the list
of standard resource classes will have no string prefix.
OK, I was going off what we discussed on Friday at the summit, but I
suspect that changed during code review. Let's make this clear in the spec.
++
The resource tracker will create inventory/allocation records for the
Ironic nodes. The Ironic inventory records will use the
node.resource_class value as the custom resource class.
node.node_class attribute, but yes.
Are you sure? Is it not this?
https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/541947f9060b146d25f97025eda6ca69b1c87226/ironic/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L121
Hmm, apologies, checking the API you are correct. Sorry about that.
Best,
-jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
