On 10/17/2016 08:43 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: > Jim, that is exactly my thought -- the main focus of g-r as far as I was > aware is to maintain interoperability between project dependencies for > openstack deploys, and since our amphora image is totally separate, it > should not be restricted to g-r requirements.
The fact that we have a unified version number of a given lib in all of OpenStack is also because that's a requirement of downstream distros. Imagine that someone would like to build the Octavia image using exclusively packages from <your-favorite-distro-here>... > I brought this up, but > others thought it would be prudent to go the g-r route anyway. It is, and IMO you should go this route. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
