On 10/11/2016 01:21 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 2016-10-11 12:57 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote:
On 10/11/2016 12:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote:
Just in case folks care, now is the best time to discuss our
election process and suggest options or changes for the next round
of elections. I'm not adverse to discussing it I just think the
best time for doing so is from the time the last election is over
up to milestone one. Then we have lots of time for ideas and debate
and any suggestions, if accepted, have time to be implemented and
communicated so the process is fair for all, candidates and
electorate.
Agreed.
During the election is a wonderful time for posing questions to
candidates in order to clarify their position or stance such that
the electorate can make an informed choice.
To me, that’s the crux: “during the election”. When exactly should
that be? Candidates can (and do) declare up to the very last minute
of the nomination window, and ballots go out immediately after that,
and voting starts. There really needs to be a period when a) we know
who all the candidates are, and b) voting has not yet begun. I would
like to see that period be created so that the kind of
question/answer/clarify process you mention can happen.
+1
Just to add on to that, it would also be nice to have a better place
for the questions/answers to be stored.
Have you a suggestion for where you would like to see them?
Also regardless of what is formally set up, anyone can ask questions
via the mailing list, that option has been used every election that I
have witnessed, I don't see that changing. I don't think it is
reasonable to ask officials to curate mailing list posts. I think what
we are discussing is something in addition to mailing list
discussions. I don't think anything ever would (or should) replace
what comes up on the mailing list.
Anita,
Agree that the mailing list is irreplaceable, a lot of of the discussion
would continue to happen here. I also don't think asking anyone to
curate the answers is scalable.
A *suggestion* would be to come up with a set of questions prior to
nomination so that candidates could answer in their self-nomination. Of
course, how we would come up with those questions is then another issue.
Maybe the questions could even be proposed to the election repo[0],
starting with an initial set of questions that are then added on by
others in the community ??? I'm trying to come up with a way to repeat
what you provided in the '14 election without the burden...
Thiago
[0] - https://github.com/openstack/election/tree/master/candidates/ocata/TC
Thanks,
Anita.
During last week there was a ton of great discussion, but when it
came to voting time (towards end of the week) it was difficult/time
consuming to find what each person had said.
-- Ed Leafe
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
